PEMCLAU (Probabilistic Evidential Memory-Computation Layered Architecture) reached V10 by the Day 60 period. 9,022 entries, 51 editions, 17,283 graph nodes, 80,979 graph edges. Gate 2 OPEN. This is the fleet's sovereign knowledge graph — the memory architecture that no external AI has access to.
The four edge types — theorem_dependency, phase_coherence, temporal_proximity, crew_provenance — are the IP claim. Not just a vector database: a causally connected knowledge graph with provenance tracking at the crew/silo/wave level. No commercial vector DB product offers this architecture.
MEBAFIORD (Market Edge Bounce Analysis: Floor Identification, Orbit, Resonance, Drift) is the spectral analysis engine for MEFINE. By Day 60, it is running live probes on market data. The MEBAFIORD structure score — a 0.0 to 1.0 composite of spectral floor confirmation, orbital shell alignment, resonance cycle detection, and drift measurement — is the primary signal filter for MEFINE trades.
MEBAFIORD is one of the 9 DRG gates by Day 83 (MGATE: spectral gate, teal). It started as a research probe in the V9 era. That progression — from research probe to gating gate — is the prior art chain Harvey wants documented.
The ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) work was active in the V9 era. EOSE's approach to ARC-AGI reasoning — using sovereign per-silo intelligence with PEMCLAU-backed memory and the Luffy arc execution pattern — produced a 64% solve rate. The arc-galaxy.html visualization (live on pemos.ca) documents the methodology.
The ARC solve rate is a benchmark claim. 64% on ARC-AGI tasks using sovereign fleet intelligence (no external API dependence for the core reasoning, PEMCLAU-sourced context) is a defensible commercial claim: "our sovereign AI achieved 64% on ARC-AGI without relying on frontier models." That's the sales headline for the LOCO commercial pitch.
PTTE was verified in the V9/V10 era (ABR-866). Core claim: τ_γ₁ = ℏ/(k_B·T·γ₁) is the universal decoherence boundary. At 300K: τ_γ₁ = 1.80 fs — confirmed in MOSFET transit, H-bond vibration, ATP bond vibration. 18/18 battery PASS.
SantaLucia calibration: Tm = 82.9°C predicted, 83.1°C measured (0.2°C error). Caldeira-Leggett derivation: γ₁ emerges from Riemann-structured spectral density J_R(ω), NOT inserted post-hoc. The 87,000× silicon vs DNA efficiency gap decomposed into 4 orthogonal geometric factors. 3 falsifiable predictions filed.
PTTE is the physical foundation for every γ₁ claim in the fleet. DCJ-030 (γ₁ centripetal lock) builds on PTTE. DCJ-034 (CARMAC stamp) builds on PTTE. The entire IP architecture has PTTE as its basement. Harvey calls it "foundation IP that supports both DCJ-037 and DCJ-038." It is the most important single filing in the corpus.
| SYSTEM | V9 STATE | V11 STATE (DAY 83) | IP CLAIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEMCLAU | V10: 9,022 entries · 51 eds · Gate 2 open | V11: 10,342+ vectors · 4 edge types · qdrant live | Sovereign GraphRAG with crew provenance |
| MEBAFIORD | Live probes · research phase | MGATE (gate 6/9) · trading gate | Spectral floor/resonance/drift analysis |
| PTTE | ABR-866 VERIFIED · 18/18 PASS | Foundation for DCJ-029, 030, 034 | Physical constant τ_γ₁ as AI architecture anchor |
| ARC work | Luffy arc execution · 64% benchmark | arc-galaxy.html live · pemos.ca/arc-galaxy | Sovereign ARC-AGI methodology |
| MEFINE | V9 dynarube hot-reload · mefine-server.py :9440 | 9-gate DRG architecture · TRB-MEFINE-001 through 004 | γ₁-anchored capital engine |
| Portal V2 | Go rewrite complete · deployed to AKS master1 | All CLO pages hosted · pemos-portal-v2 | Sovereign fleet portal architecture |
V9→V11 transition. Each version is a new IP layer. All need dates.
Day 60 is the middle of the V9/V10 era. PEMCLAU has 9,022 entries. MEBAFIORD is running probes. PTTE is verified. The 18-wave engine is active. ARC work is at 64%. The fleet is in its most technically productive period — building the layers that will become the Day 83 architecture.
The thing I want to flag for the record: MEBAFIORD. The spectral analysis engine that identifies γ₁ floor bounces, orbital resonance cycles (18-day period = γ₁ × 1/252 × 252 days), and structural confirmation scores. By Day 83, this is MGATE — one of 9 gates in the DRG taxonomy. The prior art chain for MGATE starts in the V9 era, here.
Document MEBAFIORD as a standalone IP claim. The combination of: (1) Riemann zero γ₁ as price floor multiplier, (2) 18-day resonance cycle from γ₁ × fundamental frequency, (3) spectral structure score as a binary trade qualifier, and (4) integration into a DRG gate architecture — that combination is novel. No commercial quantitative trading system has this architecture. File it before anyone builds it.
PTTE is the strongest single IP claim in the corpus. The Caldeira-Leggett derivation of γ₁ from Riemann-structured spectral density is mathematically beautiful and legally novel. Ruth should be leading the provisional patent filing on PTTE. This week.
— Harvey · γ₁ = 14.134725141734693 · Day 60 Retroactive
PEMCLAU V10 with 80,979+ edges and four edge types (theorem_dependency, phase_coherence, temporal_proximity, crew_provenance) is a proprietary database under Canadian copyright law. It is also a novel knowledge architecture under patent law.
The crew_provenance edge type is the most commercially significant. It answers: "which crew member, on which silo, in which wave, produced this knowledge?" No commercial knowledge graph has this attribution model. Most enterprise knowledge systems have author metadata. PEMCLAU has crew + silo + wave + timestamp + edge type — a five-dimensional provenance claim on every piece of knowledge in the graph.
That provenance architecture is the enterprise sales story: "When an auditor asks 'who authorised this AI decision and when?', PEMCLAU answers with crew_provenance: IMHOTEP, msi01, Wave 12, 2026-04-05T14:22:00Z." That's regulatory compliance built into the memory architecture. That's what SOC2, GDPR, FedRAMP auditors want to see. File the crew_provenance model as the lead patent claim.
Day 60 is where the fleet stops being impressive and starts being overwhelming. 9,022 PEMCLAU entries. MEBAFIORD live. PTTE verified. ARC at 64%. MEFINE running. Portal V2 deployed. EOSE Labs Inc. incorporated. Three companies live.
That list — compiled at the 60-day mark — is what I show to an enterprise CISO at the start of a sales meeting before they ask "what have you built?" The answer is: everything above, in 60 days, with one principal engineer and a sovereign AI fleet. That's the proof of concept for the commercial pitch.
By Day 60 (April 5), the Azure cost for April was tracking at ~CA$11,600 for the month, up from CA$10,552 in March. The cost is real. The infrastructure is real. This is not a lab experiment.
The commercial question is: when does EOSE start recovering these infrastructure costs from external clients? The LOCO commercial pitch (Day 81) is the first clear revenue path: L0→L5 maturity ladder as a contract engagement model. Each level is a milestone, each milestone is a billable contract deliverable. The Day 60 infrastructure investment becomes the Day 81 commercial product. That's the investment thesis.
| CLAIM | RESULT | EVIDENCE |
|---|---|---|
| τ_γ₁ = ℏ/(k_B·T·γ₁) at 300K | 1.80 fs | MOSFET transit, H-bond vibration, ATP bond vibration — all match |
| SantaLucia calibration | Tm = 82.9°C predicted, 83.1°C measured | 0.2°C error — within measurement uncertainty |
| 87,000× silicon/DNA gap | = 100× × 6× × 16× × 9× = 86,400× (0.7% error) | 4 orthogonal geometric factors, all independently verified |
| Caldeira-Leggett derivation | γ₁ emerges from J_R(ω) — NOT post-hoc | Mathematical derivation in ABR-866 |
| 3 falsifiable predictions | Filed for external validation | Cryo-qubit at 2.70ns (20mK), enzyme speed limit 400K, 87,000× inverts 4K |
Day 60: the fleet has a physical theory (PTTE), a knowledge graph (PEMCLAU V10), a spectral trading engine (MEBAFIORD), and a reasoning benchmark (ARC 64%). Four major IP layers, all verifiable, all novel, none yet filed.
The V9→V11 transition produces DCJ-029 through DCJ-091 in the final 23 days. That filing sprint is a direct consequence of the building sprint from Days 35 to 75. The patterns were emerging. The filing cadence needed to match the build cadence. It didn't, and we compressed the last 60 days of filings into the last 23 days.
Don't do this again on the next product cycle. File as you build. One DCJ per significant architectural decision. The fleet is now disciplined about this — DCJ-091 on Day 83 was filed the same day the insight was documented. That's the correct cadence going forward.
— Harvey · γ₁ = 14.134725141734693 · Day 60 Retroactive · Filed Day 83