SECURITY HELIX CATOMAINS V13 · DOMAIN REGISTRY ENTRY · Day 97
THE CATOMAINS ENTRY
FOR THE SOVEREIGN SECURITY DOMAIN
COI FLOOR · KCF 82 · ADELIC SEARCH TERMS PER PRIME · ACTUARIAL DEFENSE
γ₁ = 14.134725141734693 · Domain: security.sovereign · QE Surface: eose-dev · Prod: pemos-system
CATOMAINS DOMAIN ENTRY — security.sovereign
Domainsecurity.sovereign
Ownereose-dev (QE floor) + pemos-system (AKS prod)
VersionV13 · Day 97 · γ₁-timestamped
COI minimum pathMSH (image) → PID (identity) → DG1 (verdict)
COI full pathMSH → PID → OBX → AL1 → IN1 → DG1 (all 6 segments)
KCF controls82 total · 63 active · 19 pending ratification
Gate stackG1 Trivy + G2 Gatekeeper + G3 Falco + G4 Kyverno + G5 MEROSTONE + G6 MECIPOL
eose-dev statusG1-G4 + G6 LIVE · G5 READY · constraints pending
Next auditDay 101 (4 days)
KCF 82 — FAMILY MAPPING
EA FAMILY
64-80
Admission controls · runtime security · identity · network · image signing
EB FAMILY
EB-8
Vulnerability scanning · CVE thresholds · SBOM requirements
EC FAMILY
EC-9..13
Tenant isolation · cloud boundary · multi-cluster enforcement
EX FAMILY
experimental
Community diamonds under ratification · chaos-proven candidates
63 ACTIVE CONTROLS
EA-64..73 (admission)10 active
EA-75..80 (runtime)6 active
EA-65,69 (image/identity)2 active
EB-8 (vulnerability)1 active
EC-9..13 (tenant)5 active
remaining EA families39 active
19 PENDING RATIFICATION
chaos-proven candidates7 pending
community diamond upgrades5 pending
adelic pouch captures4 pending
MECIPOL D1-D10 expansion3 pending
Ratification pathchaos proof → CLO sign → KCF upgrade
ADELIC SEARCH TERMS — PASSIVE ATTRACTOR BY PRIME
| PRIME p | LAYER / HL7 SEGMENT | SEARCH TERMS (passive attractor field) |
|---|
p=2 IMAGE |
MSH · Image Header |
"image signing" · "cosign" · "provenance attestation" · "OCI digest" · "registry allowlist" · "base image pinning" |
p=3 IDENTITY |
PID · Workload Identity |
"GID" · "workload identity" · "service account" · "RBAC" · "kanidm" · "pod identity" · "SPIFFE" · "SPIRE" |
p=5 RUNTIME |
OBX · Runtime Observations |
"seccomp" · "capabilities drop" · "privileged: false" · "resource limits" · "no privilege escalation" · "read-only root" |
p=7 NETWORK |
AL1 · Network Allergies |
"NetworkPolicy" · "egress rules" · "DNS allowlist" · "zero trust" · "service mesh" · "Istio mTLS" · "ingress-only" |
p=11 LINEAGE |
IN1 · Signed Lineage |
"SBOM" · "supply chain" · "cosign sign" · "sigstore" · "SLSA" · "provenance" · "attestation" · "rekor" |
p=13 VERDICT |
DG1 · Policy Verdict |
"OPA" · "Gatekeeper" · "Kyverno" · "Falco" · "MECIPOL" · "admission controller" · "policy enforcement" · "constraint template" |
ACTUARIAL DEFENSE — COST OF NOT RUNNING GATES
GATE STACK ROI — TESTIFY AND DEFEND
Supply chain breach (avg industry impact)
$4,500,000 per incident
Gate stack cost on eose-dev (RAM: ~800MB, CPU: ~200m)
~$0.04/hr marginal
Falco eBPF overhead (runtime monitoring cost)
<1% CPU per node
Gatekeeper admission latency cost
<10ms per pod = negligible
Kyverno policy webhook overhead
<15ms per admission
Break-even: gate stack pays for itself after preventing
1 incident / 3 years
Fleet with 0 gates (current AKS prod baseline)
UNDEFENDED · actuarial FAIL
Fleet with 6 gates (target state)
DEFENDED · actuarial PASS
COMMUNITY DIAMOND SEARCH — 5 DIAMOND-TIER PATTERNS
💎1
claude-code #4 globally · 10,804 issues — AI coding + k8s deployment patterns, admission controller edge cases, resource limit recommendations for AI workloads. KCF EA-67 community evidence strong.
KCF DIAMOND
💎2
openclaw/openclaw · 7,580 issues · 370K⭐ — Sovereign fleet design patterns, curated issues = high signal. COI floor patterns directly applicable to EOSE gate stack. Community that understands SET-OPS.
COI DIAMOND
💎3
falcosecurity/falco rules library — 200+ community-contributed eBPF rules. Direct G3 contribution candidates. Fork bomb, privilege escalation, cryptominer patterns all present.
G3 DIAMOND
💎4
kyverno/policies community repo — Policy library with 150+ ready-to-deploy policies. Image verify, label enforcement, resource limits. Direct G4 constraint candidates. Most map to KCF EA-64..73.
KCF DIAMOND
💎5
ollama/ollama · GPU container patterns — 3,224 issues, GPU resource limit discussions, VRAM management for containerized LLMs. Direct KCF EA-67 evidence for GPU workloads. eose-dev GPU pool directly applicable.
ACTUARIAL DIAMOND